Triple
T18869212
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Act of the Parliament of Canada |
E461522
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayRepeal |
P76532
|
FINISHED |
| Object | previous Acts of the Parliament of Canada |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: previous Acts of the Parliament of Canada | Statement: [Act of the Parliament of Canada, mayRepeal, previous Acts of the Parliament of Canada]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayRepeal Context triple: [Act of the Parliament of Canada, mayRepeal, previous Acts of the Parliament of Canada]
-
A.
canRepeal
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to revoke, annul, or cancel a rule, decision, or action established by another entity.
-
B.
repealed
Indicates that a law, rule, or regulation has been officially revoked or annulled so that it no longer has legal effect.
-
C.
mayRemove
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to remove another entity or its association.
-
D.
repealedUnder
Indicates that one legal rule, law, or regulation has been formally revoked or annulled by virtue of another specified legal authority or provision.
-
E.
repealMentionedIn
Indicates that a repeal action or event is referenced or discussed within a particular document, statement, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfb7b9c8190854e7b171b98ea2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c2a7e1308190a1667d2d2d43df6c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d2166b88190add38de96cedc65c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.