Triple
T188027
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | QED Proof-of-Concept Program |
E4025
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsOutcome |
P5689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | commercial licensing opportunities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commercial licensing opportunities | Statement: [QED Proof-of-Concept Program, supportsOutcome, commercial licensing opportunities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsOutcome Context triple: [QED Proof-of-Concept Program, supportsOutcome, commercial licensing opportunities]
-
A.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
B.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
C.
supportsActivity
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary conditions, resources, or environment for another entity’s activity to occur or be sustained.
-
D.
approves
Indicates that one entity formally accepts, authorizes, or agrees to a proposal, action, or decision made by another entity.
-
E.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2594940e48190a3d8efbce46241c3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25672332081909386f35f3ca15dd2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25738b5108190866fd704fceee18a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.