Triple
T18778745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Pęcław |
E459197
|
entity |
| Predicate | subdivisionName |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Pęcław |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Pęcław | Statement: [Gmina Pęcław, subdivisionName, Gmina Pęcław]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Pęcław Context triple: [Gmina Pęcław, subdivisionName, Gmina Pęcław]
-
A.
Gmina Pęcław
chosen
Gmina Pęcław is a rural administrative district in southwestern Poland, situated in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Pałecznica
Gmina Pałecznica is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Przecław
Gmina Przecław is a rural administrative district (gmina) in southeastern Poland, known for its agricultural character and small villages within the Subcarpathian Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Puńsk
Gmina Puńsk is a rural administrative district in northeastern Poland, near the Lithuanian border, known for its significant Lithuanian minority and bilingual cultural character.
-
E.
Gmina Puck
Gmina Puck is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, located in the Pomeranian Voivodeship along the Baltic coast.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d396f54c8190ba49db31e8743842 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5933d2d048190a42480edc70bf086 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:52 a.m.