Triple
T18765653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Idaho Territorial Legislature |
E458886
|
entity |
| Predicate | authorizedByLaw |
P43628
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Idaho Organic Act |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Idaho Organic Act | Statement: [Idaho Territorial Legislature, authorizedByLaw, Idaho Organic Act]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Idaho Organic Act Context triple: [Idaho Territorial Legislature, authorizedByLaw, Idaho Organic Act]
-
A.
Oklahoma Organic Act
The Oklahoma Organic Act was an 1890 U.S. federal law that organized the Oklahoma Territory and laid the groundwork for the eventual statehood of Oklahoma.
-
B.
Organic Act of Alaska
The Organic Act of Alaska was the 1912 federal law that established Alaska as an organized U.S. territory with its own territorial government and legislature.
-
C.
Oregon Territory Organic Act
The Oregon Territory Organic Act was an 1848 U.S. federal law that formally organized the Oregon Territory, establishing its territorial government and legal framework.
-
D.
Oregon statehood act
The Oregon Statehood Act was the 1859 U.S. federal law that admitted Oregon to the Union as a state and established its state government.
-
E.
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act is a 1980 U.S. federal law that greatly expanded protected public lands in Alaska, including national parks, wildlife refuges, and wilderness areas, to conserve natural, cultural, and subsistence resources.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Idaho Organic Act Target entity description: The Idaho Organic Act was an 1863 U.S. federal law that created the Idaho Territory and established its governmental structure and legal framework.
-
A.
Oklahoma Organic Act
The Oklahoma Organic Act was an 1890 U.S. federal law that organized the Oklahoma Territory and laid the groundwork for the eventual statehood of Oklahoma.
-
B.
Organic Act of Alaska
The Organic Act of Alaska was the 1912 federal law that established Alaska as an organized U.S. territory with its own territorial government and legislature.
-
C.
Oregon Territory Organic Act
The Oregon Territory Organic Act was an 1848 U.S. federal law that formally organized the Oregon Territory, establishing its territorial government and legal framework.
-
D.
Oregon statehood act
The Oregon Statehood Act was the 1859 U.S. federal law that admitted Oregon to the Union as a state and established its state government.
-
E.
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act is a 1980 U.S. federal law that greatly expanded protected public lands in Alaska, including national parks, wildlife refuges, and wilderness areas, to conserve natural, cultural, and subsistence resources.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorizedByLaw Context triple: [Idaho Territorial Legislature, authorizedByLaw, Idaho Organic Act]
-
A.
legalAuthorityIn
Indicates that an entity holds official legal power, jurisdiction, or governing authority within a specified area or domain.
-
B.
authorizedByAct
chosen
Indicates that something (such as an action, decision, or status) is permitted or validated under the authority of a specific formal act or piece of legislation.
-
C.
legalAuthorityOver
Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to make, enforce, or adjudicate rules or decisions concerning another entity.
-
D.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
E.
followsLegalAuthority
Indicates that one entity acts in accordance with, or is subordinate to, the legal power, rules, or jurisdiction exercised by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d395dba0819087568404508590cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e58d83ae10819094b3298cb8256327 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d0b7b708190877951b6e6cdcbc4 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:52 a.m.