Triple
T1874852
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Power Act |
E39119
|
entity |
| Predicate | allocatesJurisdictionBetween |
P6911
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal government | Statement: [Federal Power Act, allocatesJurisdictionBetween, federal government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allocatesJurisdictionBetween Context triple: [Federal Power Act, allocatesJurisdictionBetween, federal government]
-
A.
awardingJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or legal power granted to an entity to make decisions, judgments, or awards in a particular domain or case.
-
B.
definedJurisdictionOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
C.
jurisdictionSharedBy
Indicates that legal or administrative authority over a matter, area, or entity is jointly held by multiple jurisdictions or governing bodies.
-
D.
createdForJurisdiction
Indicates that something was created specifically to apply within, serve, or be used by a particular legal or geographic jurisdiction.
-
E.
consolidatedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that legal authority or control over multiple areas or cases has been combined and is exercised under a single jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862f7074819096afe7fe65e179e9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb0f79fbc819085c54f3189a552d9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe2b56c81909e13d543982e6e13 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.