Triple

T18748265
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject House of Jadeja E458458 entity
Predicate claimedAncestry P30356 FINISHED
Object Yadava lineage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yadava lineage | Statement: [House of Jadeja, claimedAncestry, Yadava lineage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimedAncestry
Context triple: [House of Jadeja, claimedAncestry, Yadava lineage]
  • A. claimedDescentFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity asserts or maintains that it is descended from, or originates genealogically from, another entity.
  • B. heritageClaimedBy
    Indicates that a particular heritage, tradition, or cultural legacy is asserted or identified as belonging to a specific entity.
  • C. ancestralStatus
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular ancestral or lineage-based relationship or status in relation to another entity.
  • D. laterDiscoveredAncestry
    Indicates that one entity learned about or confirmed an ancestral relationship or lineage only after an initial point in time or prior understanding.
  • E. claimedFather
    Indicates that one entity is asserted or alleged to be the father of another entity, without guaranteeing the claim’s truth.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d394dc308190b6725073f5db324c completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e579e9903c81908180c46012bd0948 completed April 20, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e48d0b7b708190877951b6e6cdcbc4 completed April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:51 a.m.