Triple
T1869589
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF NETCONF Working Group |
E39002
|
entity |
| Predicate | documentationFormat |
P130
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC |
E5627
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC | Statement: [IETF NETCONF Working Group, documentationFormat, RFC]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC Context triple: [IETF NETCONF Working Group, documentationFormat, RFC]
-
A.
RFCs
chosen
RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
-
B.
RFC Editor
The RFC Editor is the organization responsible for editing, publishing, and maintaining the Request for Comments (RFC) series that documents standards and technical notes for the Internet community.
-
C.
RFC Editorial Board
The RFC Editorial Board is a group of experts that advises and assists the RFC Editor in overseeing the quality, consistency, and editorial policies of the Request for Comments (RFC) document series.
-
D.
RFC 973
RFC 973 is an early Internet standards document that refines and extends the domain name system concepts introduced in RFC 882.
-
E.
RFC 860
RFC 860 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet Timing Mark option, used to synchronize and manage timing in Telnet connections.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862f7074819096afe7fe65e179e9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb0b95c0c8190a37907755541f8c6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69add1dab2a481909adb0a3132348cee |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.