Triple
T1869415
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 6020 |
E38999
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletedBy |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 7950 |
E39000
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 7950 | Statement: [RFC 6020, obsoletedBy, RFC 7950]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 7950 Context triple: [RFC 6020, obsoletedBy, RFC 7950]
-
A.
RFC 7950
chosen
RFC 7950 is the IETF specification that standardizes the YANG 1.1 data modeling language used for modeling configuration and state data in network management protocols.
-
B.
RFC 7539
RFC 7539 is an IETF standard that specifies the ChaCha20 stream cipher and the Poly1305 message authentication code for use in secure Internet protocols.
-
C.
RFC 9250
RFC 9250 is an IETF standard that specifies how to run the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol over the QUIC transport for improved performance and privacy.
-
D.
RFC 9205
RFC 9205 is an IETF specification that provides guidance and best practices for the use and deployment of HTTP, complementing the core protocol definitions in related HTTP RFCs.
-
E.
RFC 8996
RFC 8996 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard that formally deprecates the use of older Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol versions in favor of more secure modern alternatives.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862f7074819096afe7fe65e179e9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb0b7e4548190a3761133fbbb7b81 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69add1dab2a481909adb0a3132348cee |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.