Triple
T18679295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commander, North Pacific Force |
E456688
|
entity |
| Predicate | natureOfCommand |
P6857
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theater naval command |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theater naval command | Statement: [Commander, North Pacific Force, natureOfCommand, theater naval command]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: natureOfCommand Context triple: [Commander, North Pacific Force, natureOfCommand, theater naval command]
-
A.
commandType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of command being issued or executed in the relationship.
-
B.
commandOf
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or leadership over another, typically in a military, organizational, or hierarchical context.
-
C.
commands
Indicates that one entity holds authority over another and issues directives or orders that the other is expected to follow.
-
D.
typeOfCommand
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of command in relation to another entity.
-
E.
centralCommand
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary controlling or coordinating authority over the operations, decisions, or activities of another entity or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d391eb488190ac2e9abf5bf255e4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e55b2783648190bb602e2b07eedf92 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478db7a248190a8c6584673773923 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:48 a.m.