Triple
T18677830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 23rd Judicial District of Kansas |
E456647
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesProceduralRules |
P6249
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure | Statement: [23rd Judicial District of Kansas, appliesProceduralRules, Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure Context triple: [23rd Judicial District of Kansas, appliesProceduralRules, Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure]
-
A.
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure are the formal procedural rules that regulate how civil lawsuits are conducted in Colorado’s state courts, including filing, motions, discovery, trials, and judgments.
-
B.
Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure
The Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure are the statewide procedural rules that regulate how civil lawsuits are filed, conducted, and resolved in Kentucky’s courts.
-
C.
Local Rules of Practice for the District of Kansas
The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Kansas are a set of court-specific procedural regulations that govern how civil and criminal cases are filed, managed, and litigated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.
-
D.
Kansas Open Meetings Act
The Kansas Open Meetings Act is a Kansas state law that requires governmental bodies to conduct their meetings transparently and make their decision-making processes accessible to the public.
-
E.
Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure
The Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure are the official procedural guidelines governing how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Oklahoma’s state courts.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure Target entity description: The Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure are the codified rules governing how civil lawsuits are filed, conducted, and resolved in Kansas state courts.
-
A.
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure are the formal procedural rules that regulate how civil lawsuits are conducted in Colorado’s state courts, including filing, motions, discovery, trials, and judgments.
-
B.
Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure
The Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure are the statewide procedural rules that regulate how civil lawsuits are filed, conducted, and resolved in Kentucky’s courts.
-
C.
Local Rules of Practice for the District of Kansas
The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Kansas are a set of court-specific procedural regulations that govern how civil and criminal cases are filed, managed, and litigated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.
-
D.
Kansas Open Meetings Act
The Kansas Open Meetings Act is a Kansas state law that requires governmental bodies to conduct their meetings transparently and make their decision-making processes accessible to the public.
-
E.
Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure
The Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure are the official procedural guidelines governing how criminal cases are processed and adjudicated in Oklahoma’s state courts.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d391eb488190ac2e9abf5bf255e4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e556b66680819082a268f1bf857db5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:48 a.m.