Triple
T18657188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ritual de lo Habitual |
E456096
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Obvious |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Obvious | Statement: [Ritual de lo Habitual, hasPart, Obvious]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Obvious Context triple: [Ritual de lo Habitual, hasPart, Obvious]
-
A.
Obvious
chosen
"Obvious" is a song by American rock band Blink-182 from their 2003 self-titled album, showcasing a darker, more mature sound compared to much of their earlier work.
-
B.
Obvious
"Obvious" is an R&B song by American singer LeToya Luckett, featured on her debut solo album and recognized as one of her notable tracks.
-
C.
Obviously
"Obviously" is a 2021 studio album by American band Lake Street Dive that blends soul, pop, and jazz influences with socially conscious and introspective lyrics.
-
D.
So Obvious
"So Obvious" is a hip-hop track by Pusha T featured on his 2011 mixtape/EP *Fear of God II: Let Us Pray*.
-
E.
It Must Be Obvious
"It Must Be Obvious" is a song by the English synth-pop duo Pet Shop Boys, originally released as the B-side to their 1990 single "So Hard."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38ea1e88190997e9b231190ba6f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e550864b0481909e59fbcc79fda839 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:47 a.m.