Triple

T1864899
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject B7 E34896 entity
Predicate vocalPerformanceNotedFor P33230 FINISHED
Object technical control LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: technical control | Statement: [B7, vocalPerformanceNotedFor, technical control]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalPerformanceNotedFor
Context triple: [B7, vocalPerformanceNotedFor, technical control]
  • A. performedAsSingerIn
    Indicates that an entity took part in a performance specifically in the role of a singer within a particular event, production, or context.
  • B. performedSong
    Indicates that an entity (such as an artist or performer) has given a performance of a particular song.
  • C. hasNotablePerformanceIn
    Indicates that an entity delivered a significant or distinguished performance within a specified work, event, or context.
  • D. featuresVocalist
    Indicates that one entity (such as a song, track, or performance) includes another entity serving as a vocalist or featured singer.
  • E. notablePrimaryPerformance
    Indicates that an entity is recognized for a primary or leading performance in a work or event.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88600b2f88190bc09303e68ab517e completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb16c09e48190a345c95eab59fd87 completed March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe02c3c819093a4744b476106ca completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abb16a6db48190af04012e8ed2269f completed March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.