Triple
T18618666
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wollo |
E455093
|
entity |
| Predicate | language |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Afar language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Afar language | Statement: [Wollo, language, Afar language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Afar language Context triple: [Wollo, language, Afar language]
-
A.
Afar language
chosen
The Afar language is a Cushitic language spoken primarily by the Afar people in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti.
-
B.
Gafat language
The Gafat language is an extinct South Ethiopic Semitic language once spoken in Ethiopia, closely related to Harari and derived from the ancient Ge'ez linguistic tradition.
-
C.
Kipsigis language
The Kipsigis language is a Southern Nilotic language spoken by the Kipsigis people of Kenya, forming part of the broader Kalenjin language cluster.
-
D.
Gurage languages
The Gurage languages are a group of closely related South Ethiosemitic languages spoken primarily by the Gurage people in central and southwestern Ethiopia.
-
E.
Sidamo language
The Sidamo language is a Cushitic language of the Afroasiatic family spoken primarily by the Sidama people in southern Ethiopia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38bbe7c8190bdec3138e7d413c9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e54d07dc288190bb3b8b5ab06518da |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.