Triple
T186180
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Imperial House of Japan |
E3984
|
entity |
| Predicate | continuityClaim |
P1671
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unbroken imperial line |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unbroken imperial line | Statement: [Imperial House of Japan, continuityClaim, unbroken imperial line]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: continuityClaim Context triple: [Imperial House of Japan, continuityClaim, unbroken imperial line]
-
A.
historicalClaim
chosen
Indicates that an entity asserts or presents a statement about past events or conditions as a matter of historical fact.
-
B.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
-
C.
claimsTerritory
Indicates that one entity asserts ownership, control, or sovereign rights over a specific geographic area or region.
-
D.
disputePolicy
Indicates that there is a formal disagreement or conflict regarding a policy, typically triggering procedures for review, negotiation, or resolution.
-
E.
remedySought
Indicates that a particular legal or corrective action is being requested as a solution or relief in response to a problem or dispute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2594809288190b3d3b1283e7e0d00 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25670feb081908e26a2543ebe7b3a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.