Triple
T1861726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alonzo Church |
E34828
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Church’s theorem on the undecidability of first-order logic |
E87086
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Church’s theorem on the undecidability of first-order logic | Statement: [Alonzo Church, notableWork, Church’s theorem on the undecidability of first-order logic]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Church’s theorem on the undecidability of first-order logic Context triple: [Alonzo Church, notableWork, Church’s theorem on the undecidability of first-order logic]
-
A.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
B.
completeness theorem for first-order logic
The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
-
C.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental results in mathematical logic showing that any sufficiently powerful, consistent formal system cannot prove all true statements about arithmetic, and cannot prove its own consistency.
-
D.
Entscheidungsproblem
chosen
The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
-
E.
Hilbert’s program
Hilbert’s program was an influential early-20th-century initiative in the foundations of mathematics that sought to formalize all of mathematics and prove its consistency using finitistic methods.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88600b2f88190bc09303e68ab517e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb09e714881909cef0f7e77b5b3b9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69add1d026748190a507872de85c908d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.