Triple

T1861587
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Silas E34825 entity
Predicate companionship P22642 FINISHED
Object left in Berea with Timothy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: left in Berea with Timothy | Statement: [Silas, companionship, left in Berea with Timothy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: companionship
Context triple: [Silas, companionship, left in Berea with Timothy]
  • A. companionOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a companion or partner to another, typically accompanying or being closely associated with them.
  • B. companionshipStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a relationship of companionship between two or more entities.
  • C. companionsCategory
    Indicates that one entity is classified under a specific category related to companions or companionship.
  • D. wasCompanionOf
    Indicates that one entity accompanied or associated closely with another, typically as a partner, ally, or fellow participant over some period of time.
  • E. commitment
    Indicates a sustained obligation or promise that binds an entity to a course of action, relationship, or goal over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88600b2f88190bc09303e68ab517e completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb16c09e48190a345c95eab59fd87 completed March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe02c3c819093a4744b476106ca completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.