Triple

T18580767
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kathryn A. Piper E454106 entity
Predicate victoryIn P4779 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper | Statement: [Kathryn A. Piper, victoryIn, Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper
Context triple: [Kathryn A. Piper, victoryIn, Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
  • A. Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper chosen
    Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state residency requirement for bar admission as unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • B. Perry v. New Hampshire
    Perry v. New Hampshire is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when the Due Process Clause requires judges to screen eyewitness identifications for reliability in the absence of police misconduct.
  • C. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • D. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • E. Perry v. Brown
    Perry v. Brown was a landmark federal appellate case challenging California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, ultimately paving the way for the restoration of marriage equality in the state.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e543cf33288190bc2cd6b7befde944 completed April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.