Triple
T18580755
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kathryn A. Piper |
E454106
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyIn |
P1790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court case Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court case Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper | Statement: [Kathryn A. Piper, partyIn, Supreme Court case Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court case Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper Context triple: [Kathryn A. Piper, partyIn, Supreme Court case Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
-
A.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper
chosen
Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state residency requirement for bar admission as unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
-
B.
Perry v. New Hampshire
Perry v. New Hampshire is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when the Due Process Clause requires judges to screen eyewitness identifications for reliability in the absence of police misconduct.
-
C.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
The Supreme Court of New Hampshire is the highest appellate court in the U.S. state of New Hampshire, responsible for interpreting state law and overseeing the state’s judicial system.
-
D.
US Supreme Court case Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly limited punitive damages awarded against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill, shaping modern maritime and punitive damages law.
-
E.
Judiciary of New Hampshire
The Judiciary of New Hampshire is the state’s unified court system responsible for interpreting and applying New Hampshire law through its various courts and judicial bodies.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e543cf33288190bc2cd6b7befde944 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.