Triple
T1857115
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Escambia County, Alabama |
E41727
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county of Alabama |
C8766
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: county of Alabama Context triple: [Escambia County, Alabama, instanceOf, county of Alabama]
-
A.
county in Michigan
A county in Michigan is an administrative subdivision of the state that provides local government services, governance, and regional organization for the communities and municipalities within its geographic boundaries.
-
B.
county of Michigan
A county of Michigan is an administrative and geographic subdivision of the U.S. state of Michigan that provides local government services, maintains public records, and manages regional infrastructure and resources for its residents.
-
C.
county of Georgia
A county of Georgia is a local governmental subdivision of the U.S. state of Georgia, serving as an administrative region for political, legal, and public service functions.
-
D.
county of Kentucky
A county of Kentucky is a local governmental and geographic subdivision of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, responsible for regional administration, services, and jurisdiction within its defined boundaries.
-
E.
county in Florida
A county in Florida is an administrative subdivision of the state that has defined geographic boundaries, a local government, and responsibilities for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, and infrastructure to its residents.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864a83848190a4ec02721306c511 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.