Triple
T18568
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence |
E366
|
entity |
| Predicate | canHold |
P1433
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public hearings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public hearings | Statement: [United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, canHold, public hearings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canHold Context triple: [United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, canHold, public hearings]
-
A.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
B.
hasPart
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or constituent part of another entity.
-
C.
availableAs
Indicates that one entity can be used, accessed, or offered in the form, role, or capacity of another entity.
-
D.
hasCollection
Indicates that an entity possesses, maintains, or is associated with a set or group of related items treated as a collection.
-
E.
hasLimitation
Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246cbca108190a92478df126d9bf8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2464f61648190ac690044be194972 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a246cb2904819085c13207565a1db2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.