Triple

T18567367
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern Fujian dialects E453789 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object Min Chinese variety C26674 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Min Chinese variety
Context triple: [Southern Fujian dialects, instanceOf, Min Chinese variety]
  • A. Wu Chinese variety
    A Wu Chinese variety is a regional form of the Wu branch of Sinitic languages, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from other Chinese varieties.
  • B. variety of Mandarin Chinese
    A variety of Mandarin Chinese is a regional or social form of the Mandarin language distinguished by its phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Mandarin forms.
  • C. Southern Min variety chosen
    A Southern Min variety is a regional form of the Southern Min (Minnan) branch of Chinese, encompassing mutually related but often not mutually intelligible dialects spoken primarily in southern Fujian, eastern Guangdong, Hainan, Taiwan, and among overseas Chinese communities.
  • D. Huizhou Chinese variety
    Huizhou Chinese variety is a group of closely related Sinitic lects spoken in southern Anhui and nearby regions, characterized by significant phonological and lexical divergence from Mandarin and other major Chinese varieties.
  • E. Chinese classic
    A Chinese classic is a revered traditional text from ancient China that embodies foundational philosophies, literature, history, or cultural values and has exerted lasting influence on Chinese civilization.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.