Triple
T18564698
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Base64 |
E453732
|
entity |
| Predicate | definedIn |
P775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 2045 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2045 | Statement: [Base64, definedIn, RFC 2045]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2045 Context triple: [Base64, definedIn, RFC 2045]
-
A.
RFC 2045
chosen
RFC 2045 is an Internet standard that defines the format and encoding rules for MIME message bodies used in email and related Internet protocols.
-
B.
RFC 2046
RFC 2046 is an Internet standard that defines the structure and types of media content used in the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) framework.
-
C.
RFC 2049
RFC 2049 is an Internet standards document that defines the conformance, operational considerations, and security issues for the MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) specification used in Internet email.
-
D.
RFC 1022
RFC 1022 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1122, which more comprehensively defines host requirements for Internet protocols.
-
E.
RFC 1447
RFC 1447 is an early Internet standards document that specified mechanisms for managing SNMPv2 network management protocols before being superseded by later revisions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e53afd8114819093b57d86f8213311 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:42 a.m.