Triple
T18523397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Andrew Meyer |
E452648
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToCatherineMeyer |
P66259
|
FINISHED |
| Object | father |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: father | Statement: [Andrew Meyer, relationshipToCatherineMeyer, father]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToCatherineMeyer Context triple: [Andrew Meyer, relationshipToCatherineMeyer, father]
-
A.
relationshipToCatherine
chosen
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to the person named Catherine.
-
B.
relationshipTypeWithCatherineTramell
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Catherine Tramell.
-
C.
relationshipToKittyBennet
Indicates the specific type of personal or familial connection an entity has to Kitty Bennet.
-
D.
relationshipToKateKeller
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to Kate Keller.
-
E.
relationshipTypeWith Kate Mercer
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Kate Mercer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d387b5548190aa030dad2cb4947e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5338f6da48190bdb374019d10db05 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469e0025c81908f16ed4f922674af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:37 a.m.