Triple
T18509944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Knox v. Lee |
E452311
|
entity |
| Predicate | joinedByMajorityJustice |
P76465
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Samuel F. Miller |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Samuel F. Miller | Statement: [Knox v. Lee, joinedByMajorityJustice, Samuel F. Miller]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: joinedByMajorityJustice Context triple: [Knox v. Lee, joinedByMajorityJustice, Samuel F. Miller]
-
A.
majorityOpinionJoinedBy
chosen
Indicates that an entity (such as a judge or justice) formally joins and agrees with the court’s majority opinion in a decision.
-
B.
joinedByInRemedialMajority
Indicates that entities are connected by having participated together in a remedial majority, such as a group decision or ruling intended to correct or remedy a prior situation.
-
C.
hasMajorityOpinionBy
Indicates that a majority of the relevant group or decision-making body holds or supports the opinion expressed by the referenced entity.
-
D.
justiceInMajority
Indicates that the concept or outcome of justice is reflected in, supported by, or aligned with the position held by the majority.
-
E.
hasConcurringJustice
Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d386df84819092355ebb260d848e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e533457e608190988304bf8bc2db1c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469dbf5208190b6fc49e02a087f54 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:36 a.m.