Triple

T18480309
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Inequalities for analytic functions E451538 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Jensen’s formula NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jensen’s formula | Statement: [Inequalities for analytic functions, relatedTo, Jensen’s formula]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jensen’s formula
Context triple: [Inequalities for analytic functions, relatedTo, Jensen’s formula]
  • A. Cauchy–Pompeiu formula
    The Cauchy–Pompeiu formula is a fundamental result in complex analysis that extends the Cauchy integral formula to functions that are not necessarily holomorphic by expressing them via both boundary and area integrals.
  • B. Runge approximation theorem
    The Runge approximation theorem is a fundamental result in complex analysis stating that holomorphic functions on certain domains can be uniformly approximated by rational functions with poles outside those domains.
  • C. Rouché's theorem
    Rouché's theorem is a result in complex analysis that provides conditions under which two holomorphic functions have the same number of zeros inside a given contour.
  • D. Bochner–Martinelli formula
    The Bochner–Martinelli formula is a fundamental integral representation in several complex variables that generalizes the Cauchy integral formula to higher dimensions.
  • E. Nevanlinna–Pick interpolation
    Nevanlinna–Pick interpolation is a classical problem in complex analysis and operator theory that seeks analytic functions, typically bounded by one in the unit disk, which match prescribed values at given points.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jensen’s formula
Target entity description: Jensen’s formula is a fundamental result in complex analysis that relates the values of an analytic function on a circle to the location and multiplicities of its zeros inside the disk.
  • A. Cauchy–Pompeiu formula
    The Cauchy–Pompeiu formula is a fundamental result in complex analysis that extends the Cauchy integral formula to functions that are not necessarily holomorphic by expressing them via both boundary and area integrals.
  • B. Runge approximation theorem
    The Runge approximation theorem is a fundamental result in complex analysis stating that holomorphic functions on certain domains can be uniformly approximated by rational functions with poles outside those domains.
  • C. Rouché's theorem
    Rouché's theorem is a result in complex analysis that provides conditions under which two holomorphic functions have the same number of zeros inside a given contour.
  • D. Bochner–Martinelli formula
    The Bochner–Martinelli formula is a fundamental integral representation in several complex variables that generalizes the Cauchy integral formula to higher dimensions.
  • E. Nevanlinna–Pick interpolation
    Nevanlinna–Pick interpolation is a classical problem in complex analysis and operator theory that seeks analytic functions, typically bounded by one in the unit disk, which match prescribed values at given points.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38465a0819099b9b42d2a662ac1 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e53066a7108190a50eda9b489c90ca completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:35 a.m.