Triple
T18458805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California State Route 79 |
E450974
|
entity |
| Predicate | connects |
P390
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Warner Springs |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Warner Springs | Statement: [California State Route 79, connects, Warner Springs]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Warner Springs Context triple: [California State Route 79, connects, Warner Springs]
-
A.
Desert Hot Springs
Desert Hot Springs is a small California city in the Coachella Valley known for its natural hot mineral springs and spa resorts.
-
B.
Carson Hot Springs
Carson Hot Springs is a historic resort and natural hot springs destination in Carson, Washington, known for its mineral baths and rustic retreat setting.
-
C.
Jerico Springs
Jerico Springs is a small village in Cedar County, Missouri, known historically as a mineral springs resort community.
-
D.
Warner Springs area
chosen
The Warner Springs area is a region in northern San Diego County, California, historically associated with the Cupeño people and their ancestral homeland.
-
E.
Canyon Springs
Canyon Springs is the namesake community or geographic area associated with Canyon Springs High School.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38345688190b565eac2e4cd7935 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e52a7cdb5c8190a399f0e4052f7d1f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:33 a.m.