Triple
T18456413
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cessnock City |
E450912
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Branxton |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Branxton | Statement: [Cessnock City, contains, Branxton]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Branxton Context triple: [Cessnock City, contains, Branxton]
-
A.
Branxton
chosen
Branxton is a small rural town in New South Wales, Australia, situated in the Hunter Region and known as a gateway to the Hunter Valley wine country.
-
B.
Loxton
Loxton is a rural town in South Australia's Riverland region, known for its irrigated agriculture, particularly citrus and grape production, and its location along the Murray River.
-
C.
Blayney
Blayney is a rural town in New South Wales, Australia, known for its agricultural surroundings and role as a service centre in the Central Tablelands region.
-
D.
Springston
Springston is a small rural township in New Zealand’s Canterbury region, located within the Selwyn District near Christchurch.
-
E.
Rattenbury
Rattenbury is an English surname most notably associated with architect Francis Rattenbury, known for his prominent public buildings in Canada.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38345688190b565eac2e4cd7935 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5264ce5948190b57baa2ea71297a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:31 a.m.