Triple
T18407072
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stonehouse, Plymouth |
E441652
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLandmark |
P105
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stonehouse Barracks |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stonehouse Barracks | Statement: [Stonehouse, Plymouth, hasLandmark, Stonehouse Barracks]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stonehouse Barracks Context triple: [Stonehouse, Plymouth, hasLandmark, Stonehouse Barracks]
-
A.
Stonehouse Barracks
chosen
Stonehouse Barracks is a historic Royal Marines military installation located in Plymouth, England.
-
B.
Bickleigh Barracks
Bickleigh Barracks is a Royal Marines military base in Devon, England, best known as the long-standing home of 42 Commando.
-
C.
Osborn Barracks
Osborn Barracks is a military installation in Hong Kong used by the People’s Liberation Army as part of its local garrison.
-
D.
Robertson Barracks
Robertson Barracks is a major Australian Army base near Darwin in the Northern Territory, serving as a key operational hub for mechanised infantry units.
-
E.
Inglis Barracks
Inglis Barracks was a former British Army installation in Mill Hill, London, that played a significant role in military operations and later redevelopment of the area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9eb8a508190a942fd75ebd8b1dc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e519591fdc8190a92f9587ec88478d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:46 a.m.