Triple
T1840339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Panama Canal Authority |
E41162
|
entity |
| Predicate | assumedFullControlOfCanalOn |
P34003
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1999-12-31 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1999-12-31 | Statement: [Panama Canal Authority, assumedFullControlOfCanalOn, 1999-12-31]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assumedFullControlOfCanalOn Context triple: [Panama Canal Authority, assumedFullControlOfCanalOn, 1999-12-31]
-
A.
canControl
Indicates that one entity has the ability or authority to direct, manage, or influence the behavior or state of another entity.
-
B.
containsCanal
Indicates that one geographical or spatial entity has a canal located within its boundaries or interior.
-
C.
hasAdjacentCanal
Indicates that one entity is directly next to or alongside a canal.
-
D.
managesWaterFrom
Indicates that one entity is responsible for controlling, directing, or handling water originating from another entity.
-
E.
hasBranchCanals
Indicates that an entity possesses or is connected to one or more subsidiary or secondary canals branching off from a main canal.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88647f9388190909bc36e795bdaec |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb32d35508190bf1c487dffbecaf0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafdb0d2c8190a67f584e67979fa3 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb32a8d548190a231c7c2ce276a5e |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.