Triple
T18401307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eileen Way |
E450000
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputedAttribution |
P130986
|
FINISHED |
| Object | voice roles in some sources |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: voice roles in some sources | Statement: [Eileen Way, hasDisputedAttribution, voice roles in some sources]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputedAttribution Context triple: [Eileen Way, hasDisputedAttribution, voice roles in some sources]
-
A.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
-
B.
hasDisputedStatus
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
C.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
D.
hasDisputedSector
Indicates that there exists a sector or area whose ownership, control, or status between the related entities is contested or not mutually agreed upon.
-
E.
hasSongwriterCreditDispute
Indicates a relationship where there is a disagreement or conflict over who should be credited as the songwriter for a work.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9fab8a8819086a9ddc0871715e0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5195185b08190bd3b5471cdc047b0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44ff1f92c8190afbb8e85d12bf2a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e451a1bda48190a9cd1db436d4be62 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:46 a.m.