Triple
T1839964
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Basia |
E41152
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalAccentPattern |
P4253
|
FINISHED |
| Object | penultimate syllable in Polish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: penultimate syllable in Polish | Statement: [Basia, typicalAccentPattern, penultimate syllable in Polish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAccentPattern Context triple: [Basia, typicalAccentPattern, penultimate syllable in Polish]
-
A.
hasAccent
Indicates that an entity speaks with or possesses a particular accent or distinctive pronunciation style.
-
B.
accentedFormOf
Indicates that one linguistic form is an accented or diacritically marked variant of another, more basic form.
-
C.
typicalSymbol
Indicates that something serves as a characteristic or commonly recognized symbol representing something else.
-
D.
hasStressPattern
chosen
Indicates that an entity (such as a word or phrase) follows a particular arrangement of stressed and unstressed units (e.g., syllables) in its pronunciation.
-
E.
typicalIn
Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88647f9388190909bc36e795bdaec |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb32d35508190bf1c487dffbecaf0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafd88ebc81908208394746351fe6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.