Triple
T1837437
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Finland Swedish |
E41096
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of Swedish language |
C8698
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of Swedish language Context triple: [Finland Swedish, instanceOf, variety of Swedish language]
-
A.
variety of Swahili
A variety of Swahili is a distinct form of the Swahili language characterized by specific regional, social, or functional linguistic features in its phonology, grammar, and vocabulary.
-
B.
variety of the Albanian language
A variety of the Albanian language is a distinct, systematically patterned form of Albanian—such as a dialect, sociolect, or regional speech form—characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Albanian linguistic continuum.
-
C.
variety of the Greek language
A variety of the Greek language is a distinct form or dialect of Greek, characterized by specific phonological, grammatical, lexical, and pragmatic features used by a particular community or in a particular context.
-
D.
variety of the Spanish language
A variety of the Spanish language is a distinct form of Spanish characterized by specific phonological, grammatical, lexical, and pragmatic features associated with a particular geographic region, social group, or communicative context.
-
E.
variety of Arabic
A variety of Arabic is a distinct form of the Arabic language, characterized by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features, typically associated with a particular region, community, or social context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88647f9388190909bc36e795bdaec |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.