Triple
T183731
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cascadia Cup |
E3933
|
entity |
| Predicate | tiebreaker |
P6631
|
FINISHED |
| Object | goal difference in Cascadia Cup matches |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: goal difference in Cascadia Cup matches | Statement: [Cascadia Cup, tiebreaker, goal difference in Cascadia Cup matches]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tiebreaker Context triple: [Cascadia Cup, tiebreaker, goal difference in Cascadia Cup matches]
-
A.
tactic
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
-
B.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
C.
endedConflict
Indicates that a previously ongoing conflict between entities has been brought to an end.
-
D.
gameWinningKicker
Indicates that an entity serves as the kicker responsible for securing the decisive, game-winning score in a contest.
-
E.
decides
Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25926be9c8190a4cfce66f57589d1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566dfc388190988b1b42d5daaafe |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a257e763d081908c54ad57d8d3060d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.