Triple
T18369987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Komi-Permyak Okrug |
E446155
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralLocalitiesMajority |
P47416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Komi-Permyak Okrug, hasRuralLocalitiesMajority, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRuralLocalitiesMajority Context triple: [Komi-Permyak Okrug, hasRuralLocalitiesMajority, true]
-
A.
isPredominantlyRural
chosen
Indicates that a place or region is characterized mainly by rural features, such as low population density and extensive non-urban land use.
-
B.
hasRuralLocality
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a rural locality (such as a village, hamlet, or countryside settlement) within its scope or jurisdiction.
-
C.
hasRuralCommunes
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with one or more rural communes.
-
D.
hasRuralAreaShare
Indicates the proportion of an entity’s total area or population that is classified as rural.
-
E.
hasRuralArea
Indicates that an entity includes, is associated with, or contains a countryside or sparsely populated geographic area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f370b88190b1e5081c2c238e7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e51751e4288190873bcc4dc140ac16 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fed3fdc81908f4ed6a81db42416 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:44 a.m.