Triple

T18350892
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject the Condemned Man E439663 entity
Predicate canAppealSentence P17875 FINISHED
Object false LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [the Condemned Man, canAppealSentence, false]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAppealSentence
Context triple: [the Condemned Man, canAppealSentence, false]
  • A. appealCondemned
    Indicates that an appeal has been rejected, dismissed, or otherwise not upheld by the deciding authority.
  • B. appeal
    Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
  • C. sentencedTo
    Indicates that an authority has officially assigned a specific punishment or penalty to an entity, typically as the outcome of a legal or disciplinary process.
  • D. canBeAppealedTo chosen
    Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
  • E. canRepeal
    Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to revoke, annul, or cancel a rule, decision, or action established by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b918221c8190a9f7b563d64ac677 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e514f83b648190b473cf611851c666 completed April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e44fe91bc08190906518e1b120fcf0 completed April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.