Triple
T18348387
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Foster v. Love |
E439601
|
entity |
| Predicate | priorHistory |
P3444
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (5th Cir. 1996) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (5th Cir. 1996) | Statement: [Foster v. Love, priorHistory, Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (5th Cir. 1996)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (5th Cir. 1996) Context triple: [Foster v. Love, priorHistory, Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (5th Cir. 1996)]
-
A.
Foster v. Love
chosen
Foster v. Love is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Louisiana’s open primary system for federal elections as preempted by federal law requiring a uniform federal Election Day.
-
B.
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972)
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 falls within the “expressly authorized” exception to the Anti-Injunction Act, thereby allowing federal courts in some circumstances to enjoin pending state court proceedings.
-
C.
Goss v. Lopez
Goss v. Lopez is a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public school students are entitled to due process protections, such as notice and a hearing, before being suspended.
-
D.
Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
-
E.
Aguilar v. Felton
Aguilar v. Felton was a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held it unconstitutional for public school teachers to provide remedial education on the premises of religious schools under a federal aid program, based on Establishment Clause concerns.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9175fec8190af865699b4e64d8c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e514f66a4c8190a0ba53d3b349178a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.