Triple
T18326319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Newport social register |
E439017
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfMembersListed |
P2776
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wealthy families |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wealthy families | Statement: [Newport social register, typeOfMembersListed, wealthy families]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfMembersListed Context triple: [Newport social register, typeOfMembersListed, wealthy families]
-
A.
hasListOfMembers
Indicates that an entity is associated with a collection containing its members or constituents.
-
B.
typicalMembers
chosen
Indicates that the related entities are representative or characteristic members of a larger group, category, or class.
-
C.
legalStatusOfMembers
Indicates the legal standing, rights, and obligations that apply to the members within a particular group or organization.
-
D.
styleOfMembers
Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the stylistic attributes or manner of presentation associated with the members of another entity.
-
E.
eligibleMembers
Indicates that certain entities meet the required criteria or conditions to be considered eligible members of a specified group or category.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b916a2d081909e249e4902f6aad9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e50aab3e7c81909b1c0a688707dfd6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fe4ee10819086b4142444fca1f5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:36 a.m.