Triple
T18312639
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massif du Sancy |
E438666
|
entity |
| Predicate | highestPoint |
P210
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Puy de Sancy |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Puy de Sancy | Statement: [Massif du Sancy, highestPoint, Puy de Sancy]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Puy de Sancy Context triple: [Massif du Sancy, highestPoint, Puy de Sancy]
-
A.
Puy de Sancy
chosen
Puy de Sancy is a prominent volcanic peak in central France known for being the tallest mountain in the Massif Central range.
-
B.
Puy de Côme
Puy de Côme is a prominent volcanic dome in central France’s Auvergne region, known for its well-preserved volcanic features within the Chaîne des Puys.
-
C.
Puy de Pariou
Puy de Pariou is a well-known volcanic cone in central France, noted for its near-perfect crater and scenic hiking trails within the Chaîne des Puys.
-
D.
Puy de Lassolas
Puy de Lassolas is a volcanic cone in central France’s Auvergne region, notable as part of the Chaîne des Puys volcanic chain and for its distinctive cratered landscape.
-
E.
Puy de la Tourte
Puy de la Tourte is a volcanic summit in France’s Massif Central, located within the Cantal Mountains.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b916a2d081909e249e4902f6aad9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5021a96b48190976273be3ff3e5c6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:36 a.m.