Triple

T183073
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Washington Senators (1961–1971) E3918 entity
Predicate franchiseContinuity P6583 FINISHED
Object same franchise as Texas Rangers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: same franchise as Texas Rangers | Statement: [Washington Senators (1961–1971), franchiseContinuity, same franchise as Texas Rangers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: franchiseContinuity
Context triple: [Washington Senators (1961–1971), franchiseContinuity, same franchise as Texas Rangers]
  • A. affectedFranchise
    Indicates that one entity has an impact on, or brings about a change in the status or condition of, a franchise.
  • B. mostSuccessfulFranchiseByTitles
    Indicates the franchise that holds the highest number of titles (e.g., championships or equivalent honors) within a given context.
  • C. hasSequel
    Indicates that one work is followed by another work that continues its story, timeline, or thematic development.
  • D. fictionalUniverse
    Indicates that two entities exist within, or are associated with, the same fictional universe or narrative setting.
  • E. currentSeriesIntroduced
    Indicates that an entity was first introduced or appeared in the currently ongoing series or installment of a work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2592516748190a85ae58eec191f14 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2566dfc388190988b1b42d5daaafe completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a257e763d081908c54ad57d8d3060d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.