Triple
T18298973
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barnard's Star |
E438304
|
entity |
| Predicate | Barnard's Star b_instanceOf |
P131243
|
FINISHED |
| Object | exoplanet |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exoplanet | Statement: [Barnard's Star, Barnard's Star b_instanceOf, exoplanet]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Barnard's Star b_instanceOf Context triple: [Barnard's Star, Barnard's Star b_instanceOf, exoplanet]
-
A.
cataloguedAsStar
Indicates that an object has been classified and recorded specifically as a star in a catalog or database.
-
B.
hasBrightStarDesignation
Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific identifier in the Bright Star Catalogue.
-
C.
isNearestATypeStarToSun
Indicates that the subject star is the closest A-type star to the Sun in space.
-
D.
isForegroundStarOf
Indicates that one star appears visually in front of another star along the line of sight, occupying the foreground relative to it.
-
E.
hasSecondBrightestStar
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with another entity that is the second most luminous star within a specified group or system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b915e3e881909125d760c15d0c29 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5017d96588190ac1e326803142976 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fdf43d08190bbcfb6b1fe3cc0ee |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e451a0ba208190a5fe92832a8f7a49 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.