Triple

T18283813
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yick Wo E437928 entity
Predicate caseCitation P771 FINISHED
Object Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) | Statement: [Yick Wo, caseCitation, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
Context triple: [Yick Wo, caseCitation, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]
  • A. Yick Wo v. Hopkins chosen
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
    The Civil Rights Cases (1883) were a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, severely limiting federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
  • C. Fong Yue Ting v. United States
    Fong Yue Ting v. United States is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld broad federal authority over immigration, affirming the government's power to deport non-citizens without full constitutional protections.
  • D. McPherson v. Blacker
    McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
  • E. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b914530c8190b4474d862a2b2a1b completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e500f7ff088190933bb8f403ce7f9c completed April 19, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.