Triple
T1827891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Hague Working Group |
E40693
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties
The New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s governing body that conducts negotiations and consultations in New York on issues related to the Court’s governance, budget, and policy.
|
E203297
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties | Statement: [The Hague Working Group, relatedTo, New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties Context triple: [The Hague Working Group, relatedTo, New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties]
-
A.
The Hague Working Group
The Hague Working Group is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties that conducts detailed, ongoing negotiations and consultations on the Court’s governance, budget, and policy issues.
-
B.
Conference of the States Parties
The Conference of the States Parties is the principal decision-making body of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, where member states meet to oversee implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
-
C.
Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties
The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties is the executive body that assists in the management, coordination, and oversight of the work of the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court.
-
D.
Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties
The Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties is the administrative body that supports and services the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court, handling its organizational, logistical, and documentation needs.
-
E.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women is an expert body that monitors implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and provides guidance to states on advancing women’s rights and gender equality.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties Triple: [The Hague Working Group, relatedTo, New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties]
Generated description
The New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s governing body that conducts negotiations and consultations in New York on issues related to the Court’s governance, budget, and policy.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties Target entity description: The New York Working Group of the Assembly of States Parties is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s governing body that conducts negotiations and consultations in New York on issues related to the Court’s governance, budget, and policy.
-
A.
The Hague Working Group
The Hague Working Group is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties that conducts detailed, ongoing negotiations and consultations on the Court’s governance, budget, and policy issues.
-
B.
Conference of the States Parties
The Conference of the States Parties is the principal decision-making body of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, where member states meet to oversee implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
-
C.
Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties
The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties is the executive body that assists in the management, coordination, and oversight of the work of the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court.
-
D.
Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties
The Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties is the administrative body that supports and services the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court, handling its organizational, logistical, and documentation needs.
-
E.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women is an expert body that monitors implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and provides guidance to states on advancing women’s rights and gender equality.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864644bc8190b2358ab897194ac1 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb01191208190a7eaf3036638ec40 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69adbf6b4bdc8190b53dbdc9c31e3685 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69adc07fff60819092b10dd0e417ac5a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69adc0fd79c48190864f53a90517edc6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.