Triple
T1824663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zan languages |
E40624
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Svan language |
E57216
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Svan language | Statement: [Zan languages, relatedTo, Svan language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Svan language Context triple: [Zan languages, relatedTo, Svan language]
-
A.
Svan language
chosen
Svan language is a highly conservative and endangered Kartvelian language spoken by the Svan people in the Svaneti region of northwestern Georgia.
-
B.
Kodava language
Kodava language is a Dravidian language spoken primarily by the Kodava (Coorg) community in the Kodagu district of Karnataka, India.
-
C.
Lule Sami language
Lule Sami language is a Uralic, Sami language spoken primarily in parts of northern Norway and Sweden by the Lule Sámi people.
-
D.
Sabine language
The Sabine language was an extinct Italic tongue once spoken by the ancient Sabine people of central Italy, closely related to other Osco-Umbrian languages.
-
E.
Isnag language
The Isnag language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Isnag people in the northern Cordillera region of Luzon in the Philippines.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864644bc8190b2358ab897194ac1 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb0003d308190a024f8c03c5f5dad |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69adbf6927fc8190ad9ce95c92153c64 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.