Triple
T1821682
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CP/M |
E40551
|
entity |
| Predicate | successor |
P78
|
FINISHED |
| Object | CP/M-86 |
E36205
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CP/M-86 | Statement: [CP/M, successor, CP/M-86]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: CP/M-86 Context triple: [CP/M, successor, CP/M-86]
-
A.
CP/M-86
chosen
CP/M-86 is a 16-bit version of the CP/M operating system designed for Intel 8086/8088-based computers, serving as an early alternative to MS-DOS on machines like the IBM PC.
-
B.
CP/M
CP/M is an early microcomputer operating system widely used in the late 1970s and early 1980s, known for its influence on later systems like MS-DOS.
-
C.
MS-DOS Executive
MS-DOS Executive is the simple file management and program-launching shell that served as the primary user interface in early versions of Microsoft Windows, notably Windows 1.0.
-
D.
Concurrent CP/M
Concurrent CP/M is a multiuser, multitasking variant of the CP/M operating system developed by Digital Research for microcomputers.
-
E.
Xenix
Xenix was a Microsoft-licensed, business-oriented version of the Unix operating system that ran on microcomputers in the late 1970s and 1980s.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864526c081908a3a4d74f689e2c5 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa662b910c8190b1746730ee09015a |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69add1bf7b3c81909fd2d548be2baa8f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.