Triple

T18215328
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Massachusetts House district E436137 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfRepresentative P130273 FINISHED
Object state representative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state representative | Statement: [Massachusetts House district, hasTypeOfRepresentative, state representative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfRepresentative
Context triple: [Massachusetts House district, hasTypeOfRepresentative, state representative]
  • A. hasMainRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or official representative of another entity.
  • B. hasCoRepresentativeRole
    Indicates that an entity shares or holds a co-representative role or position alongside another entity within the same representational context.
  • C. includesRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses another entity acting as its representative.
  • D. recognizedAsRepresentativeBy
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted by another entity as acting as its representative.
  • E. isRepresentiveOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official agent, spokesperson, or proxy acting on behalf of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90dba6481908e119eb9aa4ca0cb completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e476a6548190bda03190c5f531ad completed April 19, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4332155d88190b106d0dceb4554af completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e438f684e48190b38c64b58c518b6a completed April 19, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:32 a.m.