Triple

T18201260
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Idaho County E435791 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Riggins, Idaho NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Riggins, Idaho | Statement: [Idaho County, contains, Riggins, Idaho]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Riggins, Idaho
Context triple: [Idaho County, contains, Riggins, Idaho]
  • A. Riggins, Idaho chosen
    Riggins, Idaho is a small town in western Idaho known as a gateway to outdoor recreation on the Salmon River, especially whitewater rafting and fishing.
  • B. Rogerson, Idaho
    Rogerson, Idaho is a small rural community located in southern Idaho’s Twin Falls County, known for its proximity to outdoor recreation areas and agricultural lands.
  • C. Kendrick, Idaho
    Kendrick, Idaho is a small rural city in northern Idaho situated along the Potlatch River and known for its historic downtown and agricultural surroundings.
  • D. Plummer, Idaho
    Plummer, Idaho is a small city in Benewah County known as a gateway community to Heyburn State Park and the southern end of Lake Coeur d'Alene.
  • E. Gooding, Idaho
    Gooding, Idaho is a small city in south-central Idaho known for its agricultural economy and role as a local commercial hub.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90dba6481908e119eb9aa4ca0cb completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e0d71f288190918ca78543118bbe completed April 19, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:32 a.m.