Triple

T181840
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arminianism E3893 entity
Predicate disagreesWith P437 FINISHED
Object unconditional election LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unconditional election | Statement: [Arminianism, disagreesWith, unconditional election]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disagreesWith
Context triple: [Arminianism, disagreesWith, unconditional election]
  • A. opposedBy chosen
    Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
  • B. dissentingJustice
    Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
  • C. arguesThat
    Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
  • D. doesNot
    Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. discourages
    Indicates an action or influence that deters, dissuades, or reduces the likelihood of someone performing a particular behavior or pursuing a certain outcome.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25923507c8190bd7f6eda404b0da0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2566ccc288190add5624ede96d82b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.