Triple

T18181949
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern Kʼicheʼ E435307 entity
Predicate hasISO639_3CodeOfParentLanguage P8719 FINISHED
Object quc LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quc | Statement: [Southern Kʼicheʼ, hasISO639_3CodeOfParentLanguage, quc]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasISO639_3CodeOfParentLanguage
Context triple: [Southern Kʼicheʼ, hasISO639_3CodeOfParentLanguage, quc]
  • A. sharesISO639-3CodeWith
    Indicates that two language entities share the same ISO 639-3 code, meaning they are treated as the same language in that coding system.
  • B. hasISO6393Code chosen
    Indicates that a language or linguistic entity is associated with a specific ISO 639-3 three-letter language code.
  • C. ISO639-3CodeOfLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is the ISO 639-3 three-letter language code assigned to the language represented by the other entity.
  • D. hasPrimaryVernacularLanguageFamily
    Indicates that an entity’s main vernacular language belongs to a specified language family.
  • E. hasSuperordinateLanguage
    Indicates that one language serves as a higher-level, overarching, or more general language in relation to another language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90c7ec081909b4694ccecb449c6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4dffb3bc88190a627be9c444d5c7d completed April 19, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4331e92408190ad607ba4956a3897 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:31 a.m.