Triple
T181598
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lost Cause ideology |
E3887
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquedAs |
P3619
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historical myth |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical myth | Statement: [Lost Cause ideology, critiquedAs, historical myth]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquedAs Context triple: [Lost Cause ideology, critiquedAs, historical myth]
-
A.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
B.
hasCriticism
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
-
C.
criticalReception
Indicates how a work, performance, or product is evaluated and responded to by critics or professional reviewers.
-
D.
assessedBy
Indicates that an entity has been evaluated, examined, or judged by another entity (typically an agent or authority).
-
E.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25923507c8190bd7f6eda404b0da0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566ccc288190add5624ede96d82b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.