Triple
T181542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Plessy v. Ferguson |
E3886
|
entity |
| Predicate | dissentClaimed |
P6321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | segregation laws are inconsistent with the equality of all citizens before the law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: segregation laws are inconsistent with the equality of all citizens before the law | Statement: [Plessy v. Ferguson, dissentClaimed, segregation laws are inconsistent with the equality of all citizens before the law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dissentClaimed Context triple: [Plessy v. Ferguson, dissentClaimed, segregation laws are inconsistent with the equality of all citizens before the law]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
C.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
D.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
E.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25923507c8190bd7f6eda404b0da0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566ccc288190add5624ede96d82b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2575e7c7c819095167d8a862c255a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.